Full text
Gary Alan CLARK, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent

Loading…
Opinion
2001 Ore. LEXIS 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2001
Full text
Gary Alan CLARK, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent
Oregon Tax Court · Jan 8, 2015
Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2014
Oregon Tax Court · Jul 27, 2012
Oregon Tax Court · Apr 25, 2012
Oregon Tax Court · Jun 12, 2009
Oregon Tax Court · May 13, 2008
Oregon Tax Court · Sep 14, 2007
Oregon Tax Court · Sep 12, 2006
Oregon Tax Court · May 23, 2006
Parentheticals
holding that taxpayer’s views “however honestly held, are so incorrect as to render legal arguments based on them frivolous.”
holding that the taxpayer’s views “however honestly held, are so incorrect as to render legal arguments based on them frivolous”
stating that such a view is "patently distorted and removed from reality * * *"
stating that such a view is "patently distorted and removed from reality"
stating that such a position is "patently distorted and removed from reality"
Negrete v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 090028d (or.tax 6-12-2009)
stating that such a view is “patently distorted and removed from reality”
stating that such a view is „patently distorted and removed from reality‟
“Taxpayer’s views concerning the * * * nontaxability of wages paid by private employers for an individual’s labor, however honestly held, are so incorrect as to render legal arguments based on them frivolous.”
“Taxpayer’s views concerning the voluntary nature of the income tax system and the nontaxability of wages paid by private employers for an individual’s labor, however honestly held, are so incorrect as to render legal arguments based on them frivolous.”
“Taxpayer’s arguments suggest that millions of Americans, including citizens of Oregon, ‘have been duped’ by the taxing authorities into believing they are required by law to pay an income tax, but taxpayer is enlightened and knows the truth.”
“Taxpayer’s views concerning the voluntary nature of the income tax system and the nontaxability of wages paid by private employers for an individual’s labor, however honestly held, are so incorrect as to render legal arguments based on them frivolous.”