Full text
Walter S. Davies, Resp't v. Frederick W. Kalbfleisch, App'lt
Per Curiam.
The exceptions at pages 12 and 18 were taken in general language. Counsel, if he claimed that there could be no recovery for use and occupation under the pleadings, should have specifically stated the ground of
[874] his objection. Niebuhr v. Schreyer, 135 N. Y. 614; 48 St. Rep. 73. Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.