Loading…

Zantzinger v. Old — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Zantzinger v. Old

2 U.S. 265 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1796

Full text

Zantzinger versus Old

By the Court; --Let the attachment issue, returnable the last day of the term.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8403266

Citations

2 U.S. 265

Cited by

LaConstance T. Lott v. Upgrade Incorporated
D. Arizona · Dec 18, 2025
Verduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
E.D. California · Mar 4, 2020

Parentheticals

holding that courts need not accept “a legal conclusion couched as a factual 3 allegation”
Verduzco v. Con Agra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC
concluding that the FAA applies if the transaction “‘involve[s]’ 3 interstate commerce, even if the parties did not contemplate an interstate commerce 4 connection”
LaConstance T. Lott v. Upgrade Incorporated

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service