Switzer v. Dean

510 F. App'x 294 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 25, 2013

Full text

Thomas L. SWITZER v. Sergeant DEAN, a/k/a Officer Dean, and Town of Stanley Doug Purdham, Mayor Officer Brown Mark Belton, Page County Administrator John Thomas, Sheriff Deputy Hammer Page County Jail

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Thomas L. Switzer appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommenda [295] tion of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, and denying various post-judgment motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Switzer v. Dean, No. 5:11-cv-00021-MFU-JGW, 2012 WL 3315084 (W.D.Va. Aug. 10 & Oct. 12, 2012). We deny Switzer’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Agee, Davis, Hamilton
Cluster ID: 8477947

Citations

510 F. App'x 294

Cited by

Colebrooke v. T-Mobile
D. South Carolina · Jun 11, 2021
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna
D. South Carolina · May 25, 2021

Parentheticals

noting “[g]eneral objections that merely reiterate arguments presented to the magistrate judge lack the specificity required under Rule 72, and have the same effect as a failure to object, or as a waiver of such objection”
Nesbitt v. Cumpagna
noting “[g]eneral objections that merely reiterate arguments presented to the magistrate judge lack the specificity required under Rule 72, and have the same effect as a failure to object, or as a waiver of such objection”
Colebrooke v. T-Mobile