In Re COLLIER

Case: 22-165 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 11/18/2022

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

In re: IRINA COLLIER, Petitioner ______________________

2022-165 ______________________

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. ______________________

ON PETITION ______________________

PER CURIAM. ORDER Irina Collier submits a filing entitled “writ of manda- mus and the notice of appeal.” ECF No. 2 at 1. 1 Ms. Collier

Case: 22-165 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 11/18/2022 2 IN RE: COLLIER

has not responded to the court’s order of September 14, 2022, directing her to inform the court as to whether this matter should remain under seal. In May 2022, this court dismissed a prior appeal from Ms. Collier for lack of jurisdiction and noted she had an appeal pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit seeking review of the same decision. Collier v. Univ. of Cal., Berkeley, No. 2022-1442, 2022 WL 1676223, at *¹ (Fed. Cir. May 26, 2022). In June 2022, this court also dismissed Ms. Collier’s petitions for issuance of an emergency writ in connection with the same case. Col- lier v. Univ. of Cal., Berkeley, No. 2022-1442 (Fed. Cir. June 29, 2022), ECF No. 18 at 2. It is unclear what relief Ms. Collier is seeking in the current petition, but she has iden- tified her Ninth Circuit appeal; “case 18FL000889,” which appears to be a state court matter; and a motion docketed as No. 21M88 that she filed at the Supreme Court. 2 “The All Writs Act is not an independent basis of juris- diction, and the petitioner must initially show that the ac- tion sought to be corrected by mandamus is within this court’s statutorily defined subject matter jurisdiction.” Baker Perkins, Inc. v. Werner & Pfleiderer Corp., 710 F.2d 1561, 1565 (Fed. Cir. 1983). This court’s jurisdiction is lim- ited and does not include jurisdiction to review the deci- sions of other appellate courts, state courts, or the Supreme Court. We therefore dismiss her petition. We also see no basis for the docket of this matter to remain under seal. Accordingly,

Case: 22-165 Document: 4 Page: 3 Filed: 11/18/2022 IN RE: COLLIER 3

IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition is dismissed. (2) The court’s docket in this matter will no longer be sealed, but Ms. Collier’s petition, ECF No. 2, will remain sealed. FOR THE COURT

November 18, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Footnotes

[1] To the extent that Ms. Collier also intended to sub- mit a complaint of judicial misconduct against justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, this court lacks jurisdiction to review such a complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 351 (providing that a complaint may be filed against a circuit, district, bankruptcy, or magistrate judge, but not including Supreme Court justices under the definition of the term “judge” covered by the Judicial Conduct and Disability Act).

[2] The Supreme Court granted Ms. Collier’s motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from an- other Ninth Circuit appeal and ultimately denied her peti- tion in May 2022.