Loading…

Cervantes-Valencia v. State — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cervantes-Valencia v. State

278 Or. App. 343 · Clackamas County Circuit Court, Oregon · May 11, 2016

Full text

ARTURO CERVANTES-VALENCIA v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Respondent

PER CURIAM Affirmed. Benitez-Chacon v. State of Oregon, 178 Or App 352, 37 P3d 1035 (2001), rev den, 334 Or 76 (2002).

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Dehoog, Sercombe, Tookey
Cluster ID: 8545949

Citations

278 Or. App. 343
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 547
372 P.3d 625

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service