Full text
UNITED STATES v. ANDREW A. SANDOVAL, Specialist Four, U. S. Army
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Darden
- Dissent — Quinn
Opinion of the Court
DARDEN, Judge:
This is another in the series of eases in which written advice on voting instructions was substituted for oral instructions. Because it is indistinguishable from its predecessors, we here, as in those cases, reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review. United States v Pryor, 19 USCMA 279, 41 CMR 279 (1970).
The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. A rehearing on the sentence may be ordered.
Judge Ferguson concurs.