Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Johnson v. Griffith

13 F. Cas. 745 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1820

Full text

JOHNSON v. GRIFFITH

Opinions in this case

Majority
Majority

THE COURT (THRUSTON. Circuit Judge, absent) said the attachment first served was entitled to priority of payment.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Thruston
Cluster ID: 8653245

Citations

13 F. Cas. 745
2 D.C. 199
2 Cranch 199

Cited by

Trigo v. RIGGS NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON, DC
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 14, 1975

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Johnson v. Griffith — freecase.ai