Full text
UNITED STATES v. Richard R. RADA, Private, U.S. Army
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Per curiam
- Dissent — Ferguson
OPINION OF THE COURT
PER CURIAM:
Here, as in United States v. Cree, 1 M.J. 210 (1975), the accused contends that the staff judge advocate’s post-trial review is erroneous and prejudicial because it includes a summary of the evidence of an offense of which the accused was acquitted. For the reasons set out in our opinion in Cree, we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.