Full text
UNITED STATES v. Specialist Four Orlando WITHERSPOON, 424-82-9034, United States Army
Opinions in this case
- Majority — Naughton
- Concurrence — Wold
OPINION OF THE COURT
NAUGHTON, Judge:
Appellant contends that he was prejudiced by the sentence limitation terms of the pretrial agreement which were operative only if a punitive discharge was adjudged. In light of United States v. Castleberry, 18 M.J. 826 (ACMR 1984), and United States v. Holmes, 17 M.J. 830 (ACMR), pet. denied, 18 M.J. 438 (CMA 1984), we find this contention to be without merit. Such provisions are not violative of public policy.
The findings of guilty and the sentence are affirmed.
COHEN, J., concurs.1