Full text
United States v. David Issac WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell

Loading…
Opinion
583 F. App'x 174 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Sep 11, 2014
Full text
United States v. David Issac WORRELL, a/k/a David Patrick Worrell
S.D. West Virginia · May 23, 2023
E.D. Virginia · May 5, 2021
Fourth Circuit · Jan 4, 2021
S.D. West Virginia · Sep 9, 2020
W.D. North Carolina · Aug 21, 2019
D. Maryland · Aug 9, 2019
Parentheticals
finding genuine issues of material fact concerning several bursts of pepper spray used on an allegedly docile inmate
“[T]he Eighth Amendment does not permit a correctional officer to respond to 10 a misbehaving inmate in kind.”
“Our precedent establishes that the use of pepper spray on a docile prisoner could qualify as excessive force.”
“[T]he Eighth Amendment does not permit a correctional officer to respond to a misbehaving inmate in kind.”
“[T]he Eighth Amendment does not permit a correctional officer to respond to a misbehaving inmate in kind.”
“[o]ur precedent establishes that the use of pepper spray on a docile prisoner could qualify as excessive force”
“[o]ur precedent establishes that the use of pepper spray on a docile prisoner could qualify as excessive force”
“[T]he Eighth Amendment does not permit a correctional officer to respond to a misbehaving inmate in kind.”