Opinion

Davis v. Department of the Navy

667 F. App'x 992 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 3, 2016

Full text

Keith J. DAVIS v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

Per Curiam (Dyk, Bryson, and Reyna, Circuit Judges). JUDGMENT This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Bryson, Dyk, Reyna
Cluster ID: 8697549

Citations

667 F. App'x 992

Cited by

Izzo Golf Inc. v. King Par Golf Inc.
W.D. New York · Aug 27, 2019
Exmark Mfg. Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.
D. Nebraska · Nov 26, 2018
Cobalt Boats, LLC v. Brunswick Corp.
E.D. Virginia · Oct 31, 2017
Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.
Federal Circuit · Aug 1, 2017
Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co.
E.D. Texas · Apr 27, 2017
Polara Engineering, Inc. v. Campbell Co.
S.D. California · Feb 27, 2017

Parentheticals

noting that there is "no basis for a new trial" on willful misconduct when the jury found willfulness under the subjective prong of Seagate
Exmark Mfg. Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.
Indicating that a jury’s finding of willful infringement under the pre-Halo Seagate standard “suffices to establish the subjectively willful misconduct that, when present, moves the enhancement inquiry to the stage at which the district court exercises its discretion.”
Izzo Golf Inc. v. King Par Golf Inc.