Fuld & Co. v. United States

HAZEL, District Judge. The protest does not point out specifically and distinctly the proper rate of duty in respect to the different entries, and I am of opinion that the question of sufficiency of protest is controlled by U. S. v. Fleitmann (C. C. A.) 137 Fed. 476, and U. S. v. Bayersdofer, 126 Fed. 732, 62 C. C. A. 16. The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is sustained.