Loading…

Cullen v. Armstrong — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Cullen v. Armstrong

220 F. 1006 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Feb 2, 1915

Full text

CULLEN v. ARMSTRONG

PER CURIAM. The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, reported in 209 Fed. 704. Affirmed.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Dill, Knapp, Wad, Woods
Cluster ID: 8810345

Citations

220 F. 1006
135 C.C.A. 665
1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2550

Cited by

No cited-by records returned.

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service