In re Monarch Acetylene Co.

PER CURIAM. This case is exactly like that of In re Zeis, 245 Fed. 737, — C. C. A. —, in which an opinion has just been handed [742] down, except that there is an additional defect, in that the amount involved is less than $500, the jurisdictional amount prescribed in section 25a (3) of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 553 [Comp.. St. 1916,_§ 9609]). The appeal is dismissed. Footnotes [1] other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMB1SR in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes