Full text
Edgar JAMES v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF REGENTS, a statutory corporation, successor to the West Virginia Board of Education
Opinions in this case
- Opinion
- Majority — Per curiam
PER CURIAM:
Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we conclude that the district judge’s findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and that he applied correct principles of law to these facts. See James v. West Virginia Board of Regents, 322 F.Supp. 217 (S.D.W.Va. 1971).
The judgment is affirmed.
