Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States

96 L. Ed. 638 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 15, 1951

Full text

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. United States

Per Curiam: The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. United States v. American Sheet & Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402; United States v. United States Smelting Co., 339 U. S. 186. Mr. Justice Minton took no part in the consideration or decision of. this case.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Consideration, Took
Cluster ID: 8931409

Citations

96 L. Ed. 638
342 U.S. 845
72 S. Ct. 80
1951 U.S. LEXIS 1465

Cited by

Exxon Corp. v. Crosby-Mississippi Resources, Ltd.
Fifth Circuit · Sep 2, 1998
Whipp v. Bayou Plaquemine Brule Drainage Bd.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Oct 10, 1985
Terrebonne v. SOUTH LOUISIANA TIDAL WATER CONTROL LEVEE DIST.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1982
Detlic Farm & Timber Co. v. Board of Com'rs
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1979
Hathorn v. Board of Commissioners
Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1969
Dock Perry Glenn v. Dr. P. J. Ciccone, Warden
Eighth Circuit · Dec 19, 1966
True Oil Company v. Gibson
Wyoming Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1964