Opinion

John Deere Plow Co. v. Franchise Tax Board of California

96 L. Ed. 1345 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 5, 1952

Full text

Per Curiam: The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Butler Bros. v. McColgan, 315 U. S. 501.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8932207

Citations

96 L. Ed. 1345
343 U.S. 939
72 S. Ct. 1036
1952 U.S. LEXIS 2126

Cited by

Anaconda Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1982
Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd.
California Court of Appeal · Apr 14, 1981
American Smelting & Refining Co. v. Idaho State Tax Commission
Idaho Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1979
Chase Brass & Copper Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1977
John Deere Co. v. Franchise Tax Board
California Court of Appeal · Oct 25, 1965
Virginia Electric and Power Company v. Currie
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 3, 1961

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.