Full text
Liddon et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Loading…
Opinion
1 L. Ed. 2d 48 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 8, 1956
Full text
Liddon et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 1984
Court of International Trade · May 10, 1984
Court of International Trade · Apr 4, 1984
D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 1984
Parentheticals
'if the Commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the Commission should justify it on the record.'
"Where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant."
“Where the interlocutory order, for all practical purposes, presents a somewhat final aspect, an appellate court will review it in order to safeguard basic human rights or to prevent a great injustice to a defendant.”
“if the Commission is now to abandon the treatment historically accorded pipeline-produced gas in rate making on the ground that the ultimate public interest will be better served thereby, the Commission should justify it on the record.”
Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. Federal Power Commission