Full text
McKinney v. Kelley

Loading…
Opinion
78 S. Ct. 1135 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 2, 1958
Full text
McKinney v. Kelley
Connecticut Appellate Court · Sep 6, 1994
Connecticut Appellate Court · May 19, 1992
Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Dec 28, 1988
First Circuit · Feb 17, 1988
Parentheticals
holding that “and” was disjunctive in the context of a statute that required an employer to pay overtime wages to employees “engaged in the ginning and compressing of cotton”
interpreting the phrase "ginning and compressing of cotton” to mean "the performance of either or both”
Wilburn S. Bruce v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Conroe, Inc.
“the word ‘and’ is not a word with a single meaning, for chameleonlike, it takes its color from its surroundings”
per curiam opinion denying petition for rehearing