Full text
RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
5 L. Ed. 2d 83 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 17, 1960
Full text
RUMMEL v. MUSGRAVE
District Court of Appeal of Florida · Sep 10, 1980
Michigan Court of Appeals · Oct 18, 1978
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 14, 1978
Parentheticals
non-fugitive’s claim on habeas that demanding state’s statute unconstitutional rejected by court which held that “asylum state in habeas corpus proceedings need not and should not review the constitutionality of the statute that is alleged to have been violated”