Full text
The STATE of Texas, by and Through the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. PRECISION SOLAR CONTROLS, INC., Respondent

Loading…
Opinion
50 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 583 · Texas Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2007
Full text
The STATE of Texas, by and Through the TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. PRECISION SOLAR CONTROLS, INC., Respondent
Tex. App. Ct., 15th Dist. · May 5, 2025
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Sep 21, 2015
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Jul 30, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Jul 30, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Jul 30, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Jul 15, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin) · Jul 15, 2009
Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston) · Dec 31, 2008
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Oct 30, 2007
Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston) · Oct 30, 2007
Parentheticals
remanding for consideration of whether filing of counterclaim by state agency waived immunity for intentional tort claim like Precision's to extent of offset
Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Cubic Transportation Systems, Inc.
Supreme Court remanded the case to the trial court for further consideration consistent with Reata
“[In Reata,] [w]e held that a governmental entity that brings an action waives immunity from suit for claims that are germane to, connected with, and properly defensive to its action, to the extent of an offset.”