Loading…

Union Cartage Co. v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Union Cartage Co. v. United States

7 L. Ed. 2d 188 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 4, 1961

Full text

UNION CARTAGE CO. v. UNITED STATES

Per Curiam. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Are, Black, Noted, Should
Cluster ID: 8950731

Citations

7 L. Ed. 2d 188
368 U.S. 143
82 S. Ct. 246
1961 U.S. LEXIS 62

Cited by

Carrier v. Pro-Tech Restoration
Utah Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1997
State v. Velarde
Utah Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1986
State v. O'BRIEN
Utah Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1986
State v. Allan
Washington Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1977
Hurst v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1974
State v. Cowan
Utah Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1971
State v. Augustine
Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 5, 1969
In Re Anderson
California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1968
State v. James

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Nov 9, 1964

State v. Hughes

Supreme Court of Louisiana · Jun 4, 1963

Mack Merrill Rivenburgh, Jr. v. State of Utah

Tenth Circuit · Feb 1, 1962

Parentheticals

No parentheticals returned.