40 Cases, More or Less, of Six One-Gallon Cans v. United States

Parentheticals

• stating that “a confusing and improperly worded interrogatory cannot fairly be considered a ‘material’ question, or one the answer which ‘is necessary to a verdict’ ” under Rule 49(b)

  GNB Battery Technologies, Inc. v. Exide Corp.

• FECA bars FTCA claim for impotence and loss of consortium allegedly caused by government negligence

  Metz v. United States

• “Acts performed and letters written during attempted settlement negotiations are usually inadmissible [because] [t]he law favors settlements.”

  C.R. England & Sons, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.