Loading…

Vitoratos v. Walsh — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Vitoratos v. Walsh

9 L. Ed. 2d 168 · Supreme Court of the United States · Nov 19, 1962

Full text

VITORATOS v. WALSH, MUNICIPAL COURT CLERK

Per Curiam. The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8953406

Citations

9 L. Ed. 2d 168
371 U.S. 114
83 S. Ct. 210
1962 U.S. LEXIS 151

Cited by

Reed v. Sheldon
N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 2019
State v. Hewitt
Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 2016
Stewart v. United States
S.D. Georgia · Nov 1, 1995
Henderson v. United States
Fifth Circuit · May 11, 1995
United States v. Paul Holmberg and Mariana C. Holmberg
Fifth Circuit · Jun 7, 1994
B & a Marine Co., Inc. v. American Foreign Shipping Co., Inc. And Harry W. Marshall
Second Circuit · May 4, 1994
United States v. Holmberg
Fifth Circuit · May 2, 1994
O'Halloran v. United States
N.D. California · Apr 7, 1993
Landry v. United States

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

E.D. Texas · Mar 1, 1993

Diversified Marine International, Inc. v. United States

E.D. Louisiana · Sep 13, 1991

Erdman v. Hudson Waterways Corp.

S.D. New York · May 31, 1989

Michael Libby v. United States

Eleventh Circuit · Mar 21, 1988

Parentheticals

holding that the term “forthwith” applies to both the service and the mailing
Henderson v. United States
service effected 2 months after service of complaint
Russell Owens v. United States
over 4 months not forthwith
Michael Libby v. United States