Full text
United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
13 L. Ed. 2d 549 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 15, 1964
Full text
United Air Lines, Inc. v. United States
N.D. New York · Dec 15, 1989
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1989
E.D. Arkansas · Jun 28, 1989
Ninth Circuit · Mar 28, 1989
Ninth Circuit · Aug 13, 1987
E.D. California · Aug 13, 1987
Parentheticals
affirming dismissal of air traffic controller based on pre-employment conduct including homosexual activity and smoking of marijuana
Peter D. Borsari v. Federal Aviation Administration, Merit Systems Protection Board, Intervenor
Air Force Command's designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable 'discretionary' determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from 2680(a
Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United States
civilian passengers recover, servicemen passengers do not when an Air Force plane negligently hits a commercial airliner
while military authorities may have absolute discretion concerning when and where to fly, officer liable for negligently failing to warn civilian aviation
suit not barred where air controllers negligently fail to warn airline of hazardous flight training near airplane’s route
pro rata will continue to mean "in numerical shares or proportions based on the number of tortfeasors"
Air Force Command’s designation of permissible flying areas, although an unreviewable “discretionary” determination had regulations been complied with, held removed from § 2680(a) exception by Command’s failure to make prior study required by regulation
Richard J. Griffin and Mary Jane Griffin, His Wife v. United States
federal law governs finality of judgment for res judicata purposes
serviceman injured in part due to CAA employee negligence
explaining distinction between indemnity and contribution