Loading…

Delaware Sports Service v. Diamond State Telephone Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Delaware Sports Service v. Diamond State Telephone Co.

17 L. Ed. 2d 55 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 10, 1966

Full text

Delaware Sports Service v. Diamond State Telephone Co.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8965346

Citations

17 L. Ed. 2d 55
385 U.S. 817
87 S. Ct. 38
1966 U.S. LEXIS 624

Cited by

Nelson v. Scala
First Circuit · Oct 1, 1999
United States v. John Georgopoulos and Robert Skeries, Brady Winstead
Second Circuit · Jul 24, 1998
Cheyenne Sales, Ltd. v. Western Union Financial Services International
E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 1, 1998
Elias Kaggen and Rio A. Sferrazza v. Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Second Circuit · Nov 29, 1995
In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 2633 in Circuit Court for Washington County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Sep 2, 1994
Spates v. Montgomery County
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · Jun 4, 1991
Gardner v. Board of County Commissioners
Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jul 5, 1990
State v. Smith
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 18, 1990

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

State v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland · Mar 8, 1989

United States v. Sultan El-Gawli

Third Circuit · Feb 25, 1988

United States v. Meyers

U.S. Army Court of Military Review · Mar 26, 1986

United States v. Harold F. Mayo, Jr. And Mark A. McGarghan

Second Circuit · Apr 8, 1983

Parentheticals

interpreting the phrase “industry affecting commerce” as defined in the Taft-Hartley Act, 29 U.S.C. § 142(1)
Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and John J. Gordon Company
pointing out that § 1084(d) “provides a means of forcing ... utilities to terminate service and at the same time removes the risk of a suit for damages from the utility”
Cheyenne Sales, Ltd. v. Western Union Financial Services International