Loading…

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

DeCosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

19 L. Ed. 2d 603 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 11, 1967

Full text

DeCosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Are, Granted, Should
Cluster ID: 8969740

Citations

19 L. Ed. 2d 603
389 U.S. 1007
88 S. Ct. 565
156 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 719
1967 U.S. LEXIS 2961

Cited by

Victor Decosta v. Viacom International, Inc.
First Circuit · Dec 17, 1992
Ernest Olson v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and Karen Hendel Stephen Cannell McA Inc. & McA Television, Ltd., Ernest Olson v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and Stephen Cannell, McA Inc., and McA Television, Ltd., Ernest Olson v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and Joseph Cannell, Dba Stephen J. Cannell Productions, McA Inc., and McA Television, Ltd.
Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1988
Olson v. National Broadcasting Co. Inc.
Ninth Circuit · Sep 1, 1988
People v. Lowe
Supreme Court of Colorado · Apr 4, 1983
Jacobs v. Robitaille
D. New Hampshire · Jan 6, 1976
Ed Graham Productions, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.
New York Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1973

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Tape Industries Association of America v. Younger

C.D. California · Jul 27, 1970

Davis v. Trans World Airlines

C.D. California · Jan 29, 1969

Parentheticals

The court upheld the defendant's convictions for both second degree murder and felony murder on the theory that a single act may violate more than one statute. In addition, there was no multiple punishment because the sentences were concurrent.
People v. Lowe
The court upheld the defendant’s convictions for both second degree murder and felony murder on the theory that a single act may violate more than one statute. In addition, there was no multiple punishment because the sentences were concurrent.
People v. Lowe

DeCosta v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. — freecase.ai