Loading…

Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co. — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.

394 U.S. 930 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 24, 1969

Full text

Bernard, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Beneficial Finance Co.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice White is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Granted, Should, White
Cluster ID: 8974663

Citations

394 U.S. 930
22 L. Ed. 2d 459

Cited by

James F. Logan, Jr. v. The Estate of Mildred Cannon
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Dec 27, 2019
In Re: Samuel D.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Sep 19, 2016
Teta v. Chow (In Re TWL Corp.)
Fifth Circuit · Mar 29, 2013
In Re: Wyatt S.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 13, 2012
United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.
W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2012
Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust v. XTO Energy, Inc.
D. Kansas · Mar 28, 2012
Maez v. Springs Automotive Group, LLC
D. Colorado · Jun 21, 2010
Hale v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2007
Iliadis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Supreme Court of New Jersey · May 31, 2007

Harrington v. City of Albuquerque

D. New Mexico · Jun 30, 2004

Varnadoe v. McGhee

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Apr 14, 2004

Robinson v. Gillespie

D. Kansas · Oct 16, 2003

Parentheticals

explaining that a court assessing the predominance and superiority requirements "is directed to weigh four non-exhaustive factors" (emphasis added)
Teta v. Chow (In Re TWL Corp.)
"[T]he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action."
In Re West Virginia Rezulin Litigation
government commission’s emphasis on “responsibility” was “simply a euphemism for self-censorship” and an “attempt to shift the onus of action against speech from the Commission to the broadcaster”
Council for Periodical Distributors Ass'n v. Evans
“[T]he interests of justice require that in a doubtful case ... any error, if there is to be one, should be committed in favor of allowing the class action.”
State ex rel. McCaffery v. Hutchison
class of 40 note holders held sufficiently numerous
Brandt v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
“a stricter standard” than preponderance of the evidence
Mrs. Travistine ALEXANDER, Appellant, v. the WARREN, ARKANSAS, SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 BOARD, Et Al., Appellees