Loading…

Noga v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Noga v. United States

24 L. Ed. 2d 92 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 13, 1969

Full text

Noga, Special Administrator v. United States

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8976403

Citations

24 L. Ed. 2d 92
396 U.S. 841
90 S. Ct. 104
1969 U.S. LEXIS 962

Cited by

Bruce Kaye v. Alan P. Rosefielde (073353)
Supreme Court of New Jersey · Sep 22, 2015
Weinberg v. Silber
N.D. Texas · Apr 25, 2001
United Transportation Union v. Illinois Central Railroad
N.D. Illinois · Mar 11, 1998
Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Jul 21, 1997
United States v. York
District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1995
Henry J. Langer Patricia K. Langer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Eighth Circuit · Dec 30, 1992
In Re Kerr
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 7, 1992
Merrill Benton v. United States of America and the United States Postal Service
Fifth Circuit · Feb 12, 1992
T.A. Pelsue Co. v. Grand Enterprises, Inc.

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

D. Colorado · Dec 30, 1991

United States v. Gerald Kaiser

Eleventh Circuit · Mar 15, 1990

Jet Courier Service, Inc. v. Mulei

Supreme Court of Colorado · Mar 20, 1989

United States of America, Defendant/third-Party v. State of Hawaii, Third-Party

Third Circuit · Nov 17, 1987

Parentheticals

noting that filing a false return under § 7206(1
United States v. Gerald Kaiser
dismissing FTCA suit in which United States was technical defendant in place of negligent federal driver because Federal Drivers Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2679(b)-(e) (1964), rendered government employee driver immune from suit
Merrill Benton v. United States of America and the United States Postal Service
adopting rule that an agent forfeits compensation for breach of the duty of loyalty although part of his services may have been properly performed
Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.