Loading…

Gustin-Bacon Division v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Gustin-Bacon Division v. United States

91 S. Ct. 63 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 12, 1970

Full text

Gustin-Bacon Division, Certain-Teed Products Corp. v. United States

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8980709

Citations

91 S. Ct. 63
27 L. Ed. 2d 63
400 U.S. 832
3 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 8005
2 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 995
1970 U.S. LEXIS 989

Cited by

First Service Bank v. World AG Investment Inc.
S.D. Mississippi · Sep 16, 2025
McGee v. World Business Lenders, LLC
N.D. Georgia · Sep 22, 2023
Blair v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
N.D. Alabama · Mar 2, 2016
Comer v. Murphy Oil Usa, Inc.
S.D. Mississippi · Mar 20, 2012
Johnson v. Ashcroft
District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2006
Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc.
E.D. Texas · Nov 16, 2000
Squire v. United Airlines, Inc.
D. Colorado · Jul 29, 1997
Stychno v. Ohio Edison Co.
N.D. Ohio · Aug 3, 1992

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

United States Ex Rel. Robinson Rancheria Citizens Council v. Borneo, Inc. Clear Lake Indian Bingo Ltd. American Arbitration Association Herman Schner

Ninth Circuit · Jul 7, 1992

Kappos v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

United States v. Sharon Steel Corp.

D. Utah · Aug 18, 1987

United States v. Teretha Hermon, and United States of America v. Betty Collins Hart and Willie Hart

Seventh Circuit · May 6, 1987

Parentheticals

false statement in FHA loan application concerning intended use of loan proceeds
United States v. Gerald Waechter
“[I]t is no objection that the former action included parties not joined in the present action, or vice versa, so long as the judgment was rendered on the merits, the cause of action was the same and the party against whom the doctrine is asserted was a party to the former litigation.”
Carey v. Sub Sea International, Inc.
construing 18 U.S.C. § 1505
United States v. Partin