Loading…

Swank v. Rodriguez — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Swank v. Rodriguez

403 U.S. 901 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jun 7, 1971

Full text

Swank, Director, Illinois Department of Public Aid v. Rodriguez

Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ill. Motion for leave to amend jurisdictional statement, and motion of appellees for leave -to proceed in forma pauperis, granted. Judgment affirmed. [For earlier order herein, see 401 U. S. 990.]

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8984105

Citations

403 U.S. 901
91 S. Ct. 2202

Cited by

Medicare Beneficiaries' Defense Fund Ex Rel. Klass v. Shield
E.D. New York · Aug 26, 1996
Gammon v. GC Services Ltd. Partnership
N.D. Illinois · Jun 26, 1995
Broadhollow Funding Corp. v. Fitzmaurice (In Re Broadhollow Funding Corp.)
E.D. New York · Nov 18, 1986
Simpson v. Miller
N.D. Illinois · Feb 16, 1982
Hendrix v. Faulkner
N.D. Indiana · Oct 21, 1981
Rivera v. Patino
N.D. California · Jul 15, 1981
Bosh v. Fahey
New York Court of Appeals · May 12, 1981
Nason v. Kennebec County Ceta
First Circuit · Apr 23, 1981
Finberg v. Sullivan

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Third Circuit · Oct 27, 1980

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York · Apr 17, 1980

Johnson v. Brelje

N.D. Illinois · Nov 6, 1979

Louise B. v. Aldo Coluatti, Etc. Appeal of Louise B. And Janie J. And Josephine R

Third Circuit · Sep 28, 1979

Parentheticals

the exemption applies to rulemaking concerning the program of aid to families with dependent children
Rivera v. Patino
“Congress might reasonably have concluded that greater flexibility in promulgation was needed in the area of grants-in-aid in order to provide for their expeditious administration”
Humana of South Carolina, Inc. v. Califano