Loading…

Roberts v. Smith — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Roberts v. Smith

404 U.S. 866 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 12, 1971

Full text

Roberts v. Smith

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Douglas, Granted, Should
Cluster ID: 8985388

Citations

404 U.S. 866
92 S. Ct. 83

Cited by

Triple E Transport, Inc. v. Caterpillar Inc. (In Re Triple E Transport, Inc.)
E.D. Louisiana · Jun 13, 1994
Dobos v. Driscoll
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 19, 1989
Stephen C. Crane, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. State of Texas v. County of Dallas, Ben Ellis, John Orvis, Mike Schwille, Berlaind Brashear and Chuck Miller, Defendants-Appellants-Cross v. Henry Wade and L. E. Murdoch
Fifth Circuit · Jul 22, 1985
Crane v. Texas
Fifth Circuit · May 2, 1985
Neola N. Howard, Etc. v. Ray Fortenberry, Etc.
Fifth Circuit · Mar 29, 1984
Carr v. Bell
N.D. Florida · Jun 18, 1980
Moore v. Buckles
E.D. Tennessee · Nov 28, 1975
Fleenor v. Adams
E.D. Tennessee · Aug 9, 1974
Dreyer v. Jalet
S.D. Texas · Sep 18, 1972

Parentheticals

allegedly negligent training of guard at prison farm
Dobos v. Driscoll

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service