Loading…

Holland v. Holland — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Holland v. Holland

30 L. Ed. 2d 162 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 19, 1971

Full text

Holland v. Holland

Sup. Ct. Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 8985488

Citations

30 L. Ed. 2d 162
404 U.S. 881
92 S. Ct. 202
1971 U.S. LEXIS 792

Cited by

Esposito v. Hartley (In Re Hartley)
S.D. New York · Oct 5, 2011
Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Allied Waste Sys., Inc.
W.D. New York · Mar 27, 2003
State v. Pinder
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Aug 24, 1999
Smith v. Apex Towing Co.
N.D. Illinois · Jan 8, 1997
Francis A. Deisler v. McCormack Aggregates, Co. Dredge "Sandy Hook", Her Boilers, Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc.
Third Circuit · May 3, 1995
James Wactor, Darlene Wactor v. Spartan Transportation Corporation, Also Known as Spartan Transportation Company
Eighth Circuit · Jun 23, 1994
United States v. Daniel Martinez-Perez and Edward James Dennis
Fifth Circuit · Aug 26, 1991
Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. v. Imperial Toy Corp.
E.D. New York · May 19, 1988

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Yahya M.A. Omar v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and the M/v Endurance, Yahya M.A. Omar v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., a Corporation, and the M/v Endurance, Defendants

Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1987

Omar v. Sea-Land Service, Inc.

Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1987

National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs v. American Mail Line, Ltd.

Ninth Circuit · Mar 19, 1984

State v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 17, 1982

Parentheticals

§ 15 approval required for agreement between two ratemaking conferences conferring mutual veto power over certain rates
Cargill, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Intervenor. Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America, Cargill, Inc., Intervenor
§ 15 approval required for agreement between two ratemaking conferences conferring mutual veto power over certain rates
Cargill, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission