Loading…
Opinion
34 L. Ed. 2d 682 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 8, 1973
Full text
Enders, District Attorney of Oneida County, New York v. Esquire Theaters of America, Inc.
Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist. · Jun 6, 1991
Eleventh Circuit · Feb 7, 1991
Eighth Circuit · Nov 2, 1990
Supreme Court of Colorado · Sep 10, 1990
Parentheticals
holding that a change in the state parole authority’s interpretation of the relevant eligibility provisions was within the reach of the clause because “[a]bsent a court pronouncement on the matter” the agency interpretation had “the force and effect of law”
but cited in Warden v. Marrerro, 417 U.S. 653, 663, 94 S.Ct. 2532, 41 L.Ed.2d 383 (1974)
Robert Ogg v. Frank X. Klein, United States Marshal, Northern District of California
a state parole authority’s change in the interpretation of a parole eligibility provision is subject to ex post facto constraints because the agency’s interpretation had the effect of law
change in administrative interpretation of parole statute
