Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States

Parentheticals

• adopting the principles of Rule 10b-5 in determining whether section 14(e) had been violated

  S-G Securities, Inc. v. Fuqua Investment Co.

• "These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed "

  Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.

• “These impracticalities are avoided by establishing a presumption of reliance where it is logical to presume that such reliance in fact existed....”

  Ruth Panter v. Marshall Field & Co., Richard Weiss v. Marshall Field & Co.

• dismissal of indictment proper if government needlessly relied on hearsay as exercise of court's supervisory power

  United States v. Frank W. Cathey

• in absence of some showing that integrity of grand jury • proceedings has been compromised indictment will not be overturned on appeal

  United States v. Amador Rodriguez-Ramos

• mandamus should not be utilized to direct or influence the exercise of discretion of a governmental official

  Willis-Gomez v. Meissner

• “a prerequisite to the remedy of restitution is that a party seeking rescission must return any proceeds he has received from the transaction in order to be placed in status quo ante.”

  Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Cullather

• analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b)

  Plaine v. Mccabe

• analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under Sec. 10(b)

  Plaine v. McCabe

• claims under § 14(e) of the 1934 Act

  In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation

• analogizing it to the "materiality" standard under § 10(b)

  Plaine v. McCabe