Loading…

Whiteside v. Ohio — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Whiteside v. Ohio

415 U.S. 933 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 19, 1974

Full text

Whiteside v. Ohio

Ct. App. Ohio, Franklin County. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas would grant certiorari.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Certiorari
Cluster ID: 8997004

Citations

415 U.S. 933
39 L. Ed. 2d 492

Cited by

Clark v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 3, 1990
State v. Mills
Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 1985
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1984
Office of the People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission of the District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 10, 1984
Dc Telephone Serv. v. Public Serv. Com'n
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984
D.C. Telephone Answering Service Committee v. Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 24, 1984
People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 16, 1984
People's Counsel of the District of Columbia v. Public Service Commission

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 1984

People's Counsel v. Public Service Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1982

Phillips v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1982

Washington Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 1982

Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 13, 1981

Parentheticals

Carrington’s reference to the opportunity given to students and other groups to prove their claims of residency “should be seen only in contrast to the total disenfranchisement of servicemen, not as tacit approval of a rebut-table presumption of nonresidency as applied to students”
Auerbach v. Kinley
C & P Telephone Company had standing to appeal what it asserted was an insufficient rate increase
Dankman v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethics