Full text
Doe v. Flowers, Commissioner, Department of Welfare

Loading…
Opinion
40 L. Ed. 2d 279 · Supreme Court of the United States · Apr 15, 1974
Full text
Doe v. Flowers, Commissioner, Department of Welfare
Third Circuit · Jul 24, 2002
Third Circuit · Jul 24, 2002
First Circuit · Nov 13, 2000
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · May 17, 1995
Texas Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1994
Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 29, 1993
Court of Appeals of Texas · Oct 14, 1992
S.D. New York · Apr 14, 1992
D. Maine · May 6, 1991
E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 6, 1988
Parentheticals
upholding a Louisiana minimum pricing scheme, which apparently did not involve blended pricing, where plaintiff did not attempt to show any actual conflict with federal statutes or policy
classification in tax statute must be reasonable, not arbitrary, and must be rationally related to legislative purpose
Schwegmann noted that the state milk regulation involved in the Pearce case was in “direct conflict” with the federal milk regulation; that compliance with the state regulation could result only by disobeying the federal regulation
H.P. Hood, Inc. v. Commissioner of Agriculture, Food & Rural Resources
considering cigarette tax on cigarettes received in interstate commerce
Diamond Shamrock Refining & Marketing Co. v. Nueces County Appraisal District