confining scope of review to controlling question of law and not factual issues presented in question certified by district court
48 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1010, 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 38,460 Richard Sperling, Frederick Hemsley and Joseph Zelauskas, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc., a New Jersey Corporation
confining scope of review to controlling question of law and not factual issues presented in question certified by district court
Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.
discussing the Commission’s characterization of boiler fuel as an inferior use
Consolidated Edison Company Of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
destruction of plaintiff’s legal materials taken from another inmate’s prison cell held ministerial; issuance of prison regulations governing such destruction held discretionary
Mohammad Sami v. United States of America
end use plans do not reallocate natural gas within the meaning of 15 U.S.C. Sec. 717f(a)
The Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, United Gas Pipe Line Company, Intervenors. United Gas Pipe Line Company v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Bob Bergland, Secretary of Agriculture, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation, Intervenors. The Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, American Bakers Association, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Distribution Companies, the United States Brewers Association, Inc., Public Service Commission of New York, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, Great Western Sugar Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Intervenors. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Gas Supply Corporation, Intervenor. United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of New York, Intervenor. State of Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Nitrogen Corporation and Nipro, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, First Mississippi Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, First Mississippi Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Gas Pipe Line Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Process Gas Consumers Group, American Industrial Clay Company of Sandersville and Georgia Kaolin Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allied Chemical Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, State of Louisiana v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Fertilizer Institute v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, National Food Processors Association v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Atlanta Gas Light Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
questions on immunity, which are purely legal in nature, are appropriate for resolution by way of an interlocutory appeal
United States v. A Parcel of Land
"[I]t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. Thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the case before it."
Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. And Yamaha Motor Company, Ltd., in No. 93-1736 Lucien B. Calhoun Robin L. Calhoun, Individually and as Administrators of the Estate of Natalie K. Calhoun, Deceased, in No. 93-1737 v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. Palmas Del Mar Company Palmas Del Mar, Inc. Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Marina De Palmas Yacht Club, Inc. Maxxam Properties, Inc. Abc Corporation Xyz Partnership(s) Candelero Hotel Corporation Marina De Palmas Shipyard, Inc
“[I]t is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. Thus, the court of appeals may address any issue necessary to decide the ease before it.”
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
end use plans are not per se discriminatory
Process Gas Consumers Group v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
