Zane v. United States

Parentheticals

• ordering preferential numerical relief for the Mississippi Highway Patrol where less drastic sanctions ordered by district court were insufficient to integrate the department

  25 Fair empl.prac.cas. 267, 25 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 31,593 Angus Brown v. Carl Neeb, Fire Fighters Local Union 92, Affiliated With the International Association Offire Fighters, Intervenor-Appellant

• ordering preferential numerical relief for the Mississippi Highway Patrol where less drastic sanctions ordered by district court were insufficient to integrate the department

  Brown v. Neeb

• referring to defendants as “killers,” “warriors,” “gangsters” did not rise to level of substantial prejudice

  Harris v. United States

• referring to defendants as "killers," "warriors," "gangsters" did not rise to level of substantial prejudice

  Harris v. United States

• ordering district court to impose further affirmative relief to remedy discrimination in state police employment practices; may include 1:1 or 1:2 Black-White hiring, the freezing of White hiring, or 'any other form of affirmative hiring relief until the Patrol is effectively integrated'

  Edward L. KIRKLAND, Etc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. the NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Etc., Defendants-Appellants

• ordering district court to impose further affirmative relief to remedy discrimination in state police employment practices; may include 1:1 or 1:2 Black-White hiring, the freezing of White hiring, or “any other form of affirmative hiring relief until the Patrol is effectively integrated”

  Edward L. KIRKLAND, Etc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. the NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, Etc., Defendants-Appellants

• unreasonable search to peer through space between the edges of truck doors that did not fit together properly

  United States v. Lawrence David Ramapuram

• no exigent circumstances "since two of the agents could have guarded the truck smelling of moonshine whiskey while the third obtained a warrant without significant risk of loss of evidence"

  State v. Fowler

• no exigent circumstances “since two of the agents could have guarded the truck smelling of moonshine whiskey while the third obtained a warrant without significant risk of loss of evidence”

  State v. Fowler

• trial judge did not abuse discretion in excluding, as impermissibly speculative, expert medical testimony with respect to the effect of the ingestion of one tablet of Desoxyn, a weight control drug, on a witness’ ability to see

  Coates v. United States

• "officer's presence at the vantage point from which he discovers the evidence in plain view must not amount to an unjustifiable intrusion into an area with respect to which defendant's expectations of privacy are protected by the [F]ourth [A]mendment"

  Gant v. United States

• “officer’s presence at the vantage point from which he discovers the evidence in plain view must not amount to an unjustifiable intrusion into an area with respect to which defendant’s expectations of privacy are protected by the [FJourth [AJmendment”

  Gant v. United States