Loading…

Terry v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Terry v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission

46 L. Ed. 2d 97 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 6, 1975

Full text

Terry, Judge v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission

Sup. Ct. Ind. Cer-tiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9004936

Citations

46 L. Ed. 2d 97
423 U.S. 867
96 S. Ct. 129
1975 U.S. LEXIS 2779

Cited by

Murillo v. Musegades
W.D. Texas · Dec 4, 1992
City of Indianapolis v. Hargis
Indiana Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1992
Mullis v. Kinder
Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 28, 1991
Hudnut v. Hargis
Indiana Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1990
Matter of Trinity Industries, Inc.
M.D. Florida · Nov 18, 1987
Universal Amusements Co. v. General Cinema Corp.
S.D. Texas · Nov 22, 1985
The People of the State of California Ex Rel. John Van De Kamp, Attorney General of the State of California v. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Separate Legal Entity Created by Bi-State Compact, League to Save Lake Tahoe, a Non-Profit California Corporation v. The Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, a Separate Legal Entity, and Does 1-100
Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1985
People ex rel. Van De Kamp v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Ninth Circuit · Jul 22, 1985

MacHovec v. Council for National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology, Inc.

E.D. Virginia · Jul 2, 1985

Jackshaw Pontiac, Inc. v. Cleveland Press Publishing Co.

N.D. Ohio · May 24, 1984

Council on Probate Judicial Conduct re: Kinsella

Supreme Court of Connecticut · May 15, 1984

Klamath Indian Tribe v. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

Ninth Circuit · Mar 27, 1984

Parentheticals

“injury is the sine qua non for stating a[n] [antitrust] cause of action”
MacHovec v. Council for National Register of Health Service Providers in Psychology, Inc.