Loading…
Opinion
97 S. Ct. 198 · Supreme Court of the United States · Oct 4, 1976
Full text
Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma Ralston Purina Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.
Eleventh Circuit · May 24, 1989
Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1986
Nebraska Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1986
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 4, 1986
Parentheticals
interpreting NEPA mandate that agencies comply with the Act "to the fullest extent possible" as "neither accidental nor hyperbolic," but rather "a deliberate command" that agencies comply unless there is "a clear and unavoidable conflict with statutory authority"
interpreting NEPA mandate that agencies comply with the Act “to the fullest extent possible” as “neither accidental nor hyperbolic,” but rather “a deliberate command” that agencies comply unless there is “a clear and unavoidable conflict with statutory authority”
