Full text
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ayres

Loading…
Opinion
429 U.S. 1010 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 6, 1976
Full text
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Ayres
Eleventh Circuit · Sep 29, 1986
Third Circuit · Aug 11, 1986
Third Circuit · Aug 11, 1986
N.D. Illinois · Aug 1, 1986
Parentheticals
noting that "arguments can be made" that a buy-back agreement "as exercised in this (voluntary retirement) case," is invalid under state law
noting that “arguments can be made” that a buy-back agreement “as exercised in this [voluntary retirement] case,” is invalid under state law
distinguishing Ryan because “[t]he complaint alleges that Ayres could and would have elected not to retire and not to sell his stock” had he known about defendant’s plans
undisclosed planned public offering material because, although Plaintiff was contractually obligated to surrender his stock upon retirement, he might have postponed the retirement had proper disclosures been made
employee suit against firm for stock fraud under repurchase agreement
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5