Warren v. Serody

Parentheticals

• holding Rozelle rule "unreasonable," Inter alia, because it applied not just to better players, but "to every NFL player regardless of his status or ability"

  James McCoy (Yazoo) Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, A/K/A Washington Redskins and the National Football League, (Two Cases)

• holding Rozelle rule “unreasonable,” inter alia, because it applied not just to better players, but “to every NFL player regardless of his status or ability”

  James McCoy (Yazoo) Smith v. Pro Football, Inc., a Maryland Corporation, A/K/A Washington Redskins and the National Football League, (Two Cases)

• concluding without discussion that the rule of reason "would be applicable"

  Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building And Construction Trades Council

• concluding without discussion that the rule of reason “would be applicable”

  Larry V. Muko, Inc. v. Southwestern Pennsylvania Building & Construction Trades Council

• "federal labor policy is sufficiently implicated to prevail only where the agreement sought to be exempted concerns a mandatory subject of collective bargaining."

  Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Services, Inc., Seatrain Lines Inc., International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. McGrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp. Twin Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Association, Inc., Sea-Land Service, Inc., International Longshoremen's Association, Afl-Cio, International Terminal Operating Co., Inc., John M. McGrath Corp., Pittston Stevedoring Corp., United Terminals Corp., Universal Maritime Services Corp

• permissible to infer that four people aboard small Cessna plane were aware of impending death from fact that pilot radioed plans to ditch at sea

  Shatkin v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

• “The prevailing rule in [the Fifth Circuit] is that the award of prejudgment interest in death claims under DOHSA is discretionary with the trial court”

  Zicherman v. Korean Air Lines Co., Ltd.

• Rozelle Rule, a forerunner of the Plan B right of first refusal and compensation restraints, found to violate § 1 of the Sherman Act

  McNeil v. National Football League

• “under appropriate circumstances, we find that a non-labor group may avail itself of the [nonstatutory] labor exemption.”

  In Re Detroit Auto Dealers Association, Inc., Barnett Pontiac-Datsun, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

• "under appropriate circumstances, we find that a non-labor group may avail itself of the [nonstatutory] labor exemption."

  In Re Detroit Auto Dealers Association, Inc., Barnett Pontiac-Datsun, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

• “federal labor policy is sufficiently implicated to prevail only where the agreement sought to be exempted concerns a mandatory subject of collective bargaining.”

  Consolidated Express, Inc. v. New York Shipping Ass'n

• “A union’s duty, in representing its members and protecting them from invidious treatment, must certainly be broader then simply refusing to sign overtly discriminatory agreements”

  Alexander v. Local 496, Laborers International Union