Full text
Gasper v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District

Loading…
Opinion
59 L. Ed. 2d 40 · Supreme Court of the United States · Jan 8, 1979
Full text
Gasper v. Louisiana Stadium and Exposition District
D. Kansas · Aug 6, 1997
S.D. New York · Jun 11, 1997
S.D. New York · May 14, 1997
Second Circuit · Mar 12, 1996
Parentheticals
concluding that claims filed by “persons who were allegedly induced by fraud to purchase [the Debtor’s] stock” should be subordinated
holding that the 37 C.F.R. § 1.14(e) provisions for disclosure do not vitiate the applicability of exemption (b)(3)
finding that actions of officers of entity that had its genesis in state law and was at time of suit still governed by state statute were taken "under color of state law".
finding that actions of officers of entity that had its genesis in state law and was at time of suit still governed by state statute were taken “under color of state law”.
Rhode Island Affiliate, American Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. Rhode Island Lottery Commission
noting but not reaching district court's disallowance of bankruptcy claims to the extent made on behalf of a class of claimants
noting but not reaching district court’s disal-lowance of bankruptcy claims to the extent made on behalf of a class of claimants
Certified Class in the Charter Securities Litigation v. Charter Co. (In re Charter Co.)
relying on the principle of equitable subordination in bankruptcy in order to subordinate to the claims of general creditors the claims of stockholders who asserted they were fraudulently induced to purchase stock
Commissioner’s order refusing to consider abandoned patent applications as evidence or prior art is interlocutory
Bally Manufacturing Corp. v. Sidney A. Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
stockholders whose claims were not purely for the return of their equity investment were treated as creditors.
the National Bank Act is "an entirely different statutory scheme . . . under which distribution is to be 'ratable' rather than 'fair and equitable' "
the National Bank Act is “an entirely different statutory scheme . . . under which distribution is to be ‘ratable’ rather than ‘fair and equitable’ ”
35 U.S.C. § 122 (1970) constitutes a withholding statute