Loading…

Bodde v. Texas — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Bodde v. Texas

440 U.S. 968 · Supreme Court of the United States · Mar 19, 1979

Full text

Bodde v. Texas

Opinions in this case

Majority
Dissent — Brennanmarshall

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Cer- tiorari denied.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brennan, Marshall
Cluster ID: 9021743

Citations

440 U.S. 968
99 S. Ct. 1520

Cited by

Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury
Third Circuit · Apr 17, 2015
Gabino Anguiano Gutierrez v. State
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo) · Jun 23, 2004
Thibodeaux v. Grasso Production Management Inc.
Fifth Circuit · May 18, 2004
Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
D.C. Circuit · Jan 25, 1996
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
D.C. Circuit · Nov 7, 1995

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Harry Hurston v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs McGray Construction Company Beaver Insurance Company

Ninth Circuit · Apr 1, 1993

Marshall Durbin Food Corp. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

Eleventh Circuit · Apr 30, 1992

Trevino v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Jun 12, 1991

Livingston v. State

Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas) · Dec 11, 1989

Lavigne v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas · Nov 9, 1989

Court of Appeals of Texas · May 4, 1989

Garcia v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas · Apr 6, 1989

Parentheticals

upholding an ICC regulation "requiring the remittance to freight car owners of all demurrage charges collected by the delivering carrier that are in excess of ten dollars per day per car"
Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
upholding an ICC regulation “requiring the remittance to freight car owners of all demurrage charges collected by the delivering carrier that are in excess of ten dollars per day per car”
Atchison, Topeka And Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission
"better view" is that trial judge decide existence of "common law" marriage for purposes of claim of spousal privilege
Reece v. State
because the Interstate Commerce Act “contains no express sanction for noncompliance” with the statutory deadline, belated agency proceedings need not be dismissed
Langbord v. United States Department of the Treasury
arbitrary and capricious decisions must be “rationally supported”
Bickel v. Long Term Disability Plan of Western Electric