Full text
Dougherty v. Haaland

Loading…
Opinion
100 S. Ct. 524 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 10, 1979
Full text
Dougherty v. Haaland
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Jun 29, 1990
First Circuit · Dec 7, 1989
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 30, 1989
Parentheticals
Virginia riparian owner not entitled to damages for diminished value because of pollution of water by municipality
unattractive use to which city put James River may have detrimental effect on value of property along shore but does not constitute due process violation
automatic termination of an oil and gas lease for nonpayment of delay rental does not constitute a "proceeding" within the meaning of Bankruptcy Act § 11(e), 11 U.S.C. § 29(e)
Virginia riparian owner not entitled to damages for diminished value because of pollution of water by municipality
the alleged pollution of the James River and damages to adjoining landowners caused by a sewage plant does not involve traditional maritime jurisdiction and does not confer admiralty jurisdiction
automatic termination of an oil and gas lease for nonpayment of delay rental does not constitute a “proceeding” within the meaning of Bankruptcy Act s 11(e), 11 U.S.C. s 29(e)
automatic termination of an oil and gas lease for nonpayment of delay rental does not constitute a “proceeding” within the meaning of Bankruptcy Act § 11(e), 11 U.S.C. § 29(e)