Loading…

Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States

62 L. Ed. 2d 426 · Supreme Court of the United States · Dec 10, 1979

Full text

Jicarilla Apache Tribe v. United States

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Blackmun would grant certiorari.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Brennan, Certiorari
Cluster ID: 9024706

Citations

62 L. Ed. 2d 426
444 U.S. 995
100 S. Ct. 530
1979 U.S. LEXIS 4101

Cited by

State v. Hedge
Supreme Court of Connecticut · Aug 3, 2010
Blankenship v. Bartlett
Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 28, 2009
Republic Property Trust v. Republic Properties Corp.
District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2008
Yankton Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
D. South Dakota · Mar 21, 2002
Estrada v. Adame
Court of Appeals of Texas · Jul 24, 1997
Doe v. Sundquist
M.D. Tennessee · Aug 23, 1996
State of Wyo. v. United States
D. Wyoming · Jul 22, 1996
Wyoming v. United States
D. Wyoming · Jul 22, 1996
Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee. Apache Survival Coalition v. United States of America, and James Abbott, in His Official Capacity as Supervisor, Coronado National Forest, and the University of Arizona, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellee

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1994

Apache Survival Coalition v. United States

Ninth Circuit · Apr 8, 1994

Wacondo v. Concha

New Mexico Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1994

McMillan Park Committee v. National Capital Planning Commission

D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1992

Parentheticals

noting that "the mandate of NHPA ... is quite broad” and refusing to adopt a "crabbed interpretation” of section 106
Lee v. Thornburgh
"the language of § 17 is broad enough to imply a private right of action ...’’
The Limited, Inc. v. McCrory Corp.
section 106 procedures apply to the different phases of a project and must be complied with again when the agency next has authority to approve or fund the project.
McMillan Park Committee v. National Capital Planning Commission