Full text
Fatico v. United States
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Loading…
Loading…
Opinion
62 L. Ed. 2d 755 · Supreme Court of the United States · Feb 19, 1980
Full text
Fatico v. United States
W.D. New York · Nov 13, 1996
E.D. New York · Oct 23, 1996
Second Circuit · Aug 26, 1996
Parentheticals
interpreting statutory language in Federal Election Commission Act almost identical to that in FTCA section 9
agency decision will not be overturned based on technical error if the agency would have reached the same decision absent the error
governmental interest in conducting field interviews of contributors to LaRouche campaign to determine whether campaign violated Act withstands exacting scrutiny
one resisting a summons must raise at least “colorable allegations” of an improper purpose before court must afford him opportunity to substantiate his allegations
agency decision will not be overturned based on technical error if the agency would have reached the same decision absent the error
"The appropriate standard is to remand for correction of error only when there is substantial doubt that the administrative agency would have reached the result it did absent reference to the material."
“The appropriate standard is to remand for correction of error only when there is substantial doubt that the administrative agency would have reached the result it did absent reference to the material.”
pre-guidelines case holding that out-of-court statements of unidentified informant admissible for sentencing
pre-guidelines case holding that out-of-court statements of unidentified informant admissible for sentencing
“Quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 + % probable.”
“Quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50 + % probable.”
"Quantified, the preponderance standard would be 50+% probable."