Loading…

Gomez v. Toledo — freecase.ai

Search Pricing About Why now Resources Guides

Opinion

Gomez v. Toledo

64 L. Ed. 2d 786 · Supreme Court of the United States · May 12, 1980

Full text

Gomez v. Toledo

C. A. 1st Cir. [Certio-rari granted, 444 U. S. 1031.] Motion of petitioner for leave to file a supplemental brief after argument granted.

Notice

Freecase is a legal research tool. It does not determine whether a case is good law and does not provide legal advice.

Metadata

Status: Published
Author
Judges: Not listed
Cluster ID: 9026309

Citations

64 L. Ed. 2d 786
446 U.S. 933
100 S. Ct. 2149
1980 U.S. LEXIS 1545

Cited by

Bryski v. City of Chicago
Appellate Court of Illinois · Oct 15, 1986
In Re Pago Pago Aircrash of January 30, 1974
C.D. California · Oct 9, 1981
Lewis v. Reagan
District of Columbia · Jun 9, 1981
Michael Guidry v. Continental Oil Company, Travelers Insurance Company, Intervenor-Appellee
Fifth Circuit · Apr 6, 1981
Carmen Di Rago and Joan Di Rago, His Wife v. American Export Lines, Inc.
Third Circuit · Feb 27, 1981
Ryder v. United States
D. Massachusetts · Feb 5, 1981
Charles Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana Ss "Campeche"
Second Circuit · Jan 5, 1981
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,800, Bankr. L. Rep. P 67,739, Bankr. L. Rep. P 67,804 in Re Continental Investment Corporation, Debtor. Monte J. Wallace and Neil W. Wallace

© 2026 freecase.aicontact@freecase.aiBuilt by lawyers. Powered by AI.

Freecase.ai provides legal information for educational and research purposes only. It is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Always consult a licensed attorney for legal guidance. Terms of Service

First Circuit · Oct 31, 1980

In re Continental Investment Corp.

First Circuit · Oct 31, 1980

Monsma v. Monsma

Alaska Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1980

P Stone, Inc. v. Koppers Corporation Lycoming Silica Sand, Koppers Company, Inc. And Lycoming Silica Sand Company

Third Circuit · Oct 7, 1980

Parentheticals

review of the LHWCA and its legislative history establishes "that Congress intended the stevedore to recover the full amount of its lien"
Charles Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana Ss "Campeche"
review of the LHWCA and its legislative history establishes “that Congress intended the stevedore to recover the full amount of its lien”
Charles Evans v. Transportacion Maritime Mexicana Ss "Campeche"